Citation Attribution

Problem

Just asking the model to 'include citations' is not enough. Citations that the model writes freely are ungrounded — they look real but may point to documents that were never retrieved or quote text that does not appear in the source. The binding from a span of the answer to a span of evidence has to be created by the retrieval pipeline and carried through generation and delivery; otherwise the citations cannot be trusted, and the whole audit story collapses.

Solution

During retrieval, assign each chunk a stable source-id and keep a registry of which ids were retrieved for this turn. During generation, either (a) prompt the model to emit citation markers (`[src-id]`) at the chosen granularity, then resolve and validate them against the registry, refusing any id that was not retrieved; or (b) use a structured-output schema that has a `claims` array with `text` and `supporting_chunk_ids` fields. At delivery, attach the resolved source records to the answer so the UI can render the binding. Pair with citation-streaming (delivery), naive-rag / contextual-retrieval (the upstream retrieval), and hallucinated-citations (the anti-pattern that ignores binding).

When to use

• Users must be able to trace each claim to a retrieved source.
• Compliance, research, or audit settings make unsupported claims unacceptable.
• The delivery UI can render per-claim or per-span source links.
• The retrieval pipeline already assigns stable source ids to chunks.